All Issue

2025 Vol.34, Issue 1

Research Paper

31 March 2025. pp. 1-26
Abstract
This study tests the relationship between environmental, social, and governance (ESG) scores and firm productivity in South Korea. We employ a lagged-term regression analysis and instrumental variable approach to find that the composite score of ESG is inadequate in explaining total factor productivity (TFP). This finding is due to the mixed direction that each E, S, and G component has on TFP. The governance component consistently impacts firm productivity while Environment and Social components do not. Additionally, labor productivity is positively linked with ESG scores. We argue that the labor market is the channel through which the ESG performance and firm productivity are linked and whether firms can exploit this channel depends on financial restrictions.
본 연구는 최근에 많은 관심을 갖는 한국 금융시장에 상장된 기업들의 Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) 평점이 총요소생산성과 관계가 있는지 모색한다. 내생성을 극복하기 위해 도구변수방법과 지연회귀분석(Lagged-term regression)을 활용해서 환경, 사회, 지배구조의 질을 대변하는 종합지수는 기업의 생산성을 설명하기엔 부족하다는 결과를 보인다. 그러나 ESG 점수는 노동 생산성과 긍정적으로 관련되어 있다는 결과를 도출한다. 노동 시장이 ESG 성과와 기업 생산성이 연결된 경로임을 주장하며, 기업이 이 경로를 활용할 수 있는지는 재정 제약에 달려 있다고 분석한다.
References
  1. Ackerberg, D. A., K. Caves, and G. Frazer, “Identification Properties of Recent Production Function Estimators,” Econometrica, Vol. 83, No. 6, 2015, pp. 2411~2451.10.3982/ECTA13408
  2. Albulescu, C. T., and C. Turcu, “Productivity, Financial Performance, and Corporate Governance: Evidence From Romanian R&D Firms,” Applied Economics, Vol. 54, No. 51, 2022, pp. 5956~5975.10.1080/00036846.2022.2056125
  3. Avramov, D., S. Cheng, A. Lioui, and A. Tarelli, “Sustainable Investing with ESG Rating Uncertainty,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 145, No. 2, Part B, 2022, pp. 642~664.10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.09.009
  4. Barnea, A., and A. Rubin, “Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders,” Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 97, No. 1, 2010, pp. 71~86.10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z
  5. Barrymore, N., and R. C. Sampson, ESG Performance and Labor Productivity: Exploring whether and when ESG affects firm performance, Paper Presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings, 2021.10.5465/AMBPP.2021.13997abstract
  6. Benlemlih, M., “Corporate Social Responsibility and Dividend Policy,” Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 47, 2019, pp. 114~138.10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.07.005
  7. Chen, K. C., Z. Chen, and K. J. Wei, “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow and the Effect of Shareholder Rights on the Implied Cost of Equity Capital,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2011, pp. 171~207.10.1017/S0022109010000591
  8. DasGupta, R., “Financial Performance Shortfall, ESG Controversies, and ESG Performance: Evidence from Firms Around the World,” Finance Research Letters, Vol. 46, 2022, 102487.10.1016/j.frl.2021.102487
  9. Deng, X., W. Li, and X. Ren, “More Sustainable, More Productive: Evidence from ESG Ratings and Total Factor Productivity Among Listed Chinese Firms,” Finance Research Letters, Vol. 51, 2023, 103439.10.1016/j.frl.2022.103439
  10. Ding, X., Z. Sheng, A. Appolloni, M. Shahzad, and S. Han, Digital Transformation, ESG Practice, and Total Factor Productivity, Business Strategy and the Environment, 2024.10.1002/bse.3718
  11. Dorfleitner, G., C. Kreuzer, and C. Sparrer, “ESG Controversies and Controversial ESG: About Silent Saints and Small Sinners,” Journal of Asset Management, Vol. 21, No. 5, 2020, pp. 393~412.10.1057/s41260-020-00178-x
  12. El Ghoul, S., O. Guedhami, C. C. Y. Kwok, and D. R. Mishra, “Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Cost of Capital?” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2011, pp. 2388~2406.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007
  13. Fatemi, A., I. Fooladi, and H. Tehranian, “Valuation Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 59, 2015, pp. 182~192.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.04.028
  14. Feng, J., J. W. Goodell, and D. Shen, “ESG Rating and Stock Price Crash Risk: Evidence from China,” Finance Research Letters, Vol. 46, 2022, 102476.10.1016/j.frl.2021.102476
  15. Kong, G., and D. Kong, “Corporate Governance, Human Capital, and Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Non-Listed Firms,” Applied Economics, Vol. 49, No. 27, 2017, pp. 2655~2668.10.1080/00036846.2016.1245837
  16. Levinsohn, J., and A. Petrin, “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables,” The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, No. 2, 2003, pp. 317~341.10.1111/1467-937X.00246
  17. Li, G., K. Fujiyama, C. Wu, and Y. Zheng, “Employment Protection, Corporate Governance, and Labor Productivity Around the World,” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Vol. 92, 2024, 101978.10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101978
  18. Li, Z., and Z. Han, “Green Finance, ESG Performance and Enterprise Total Factor Productivity,” Frontiers in Economics and Management, Vol. 3, No. 8, 2022, pp. 473~486.
  19. Madhavan, A., A. Sobczyk, and A. Ang, “Toward ESG Alpha: Analyzing ESG Exposures through a Factor Lens,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 77, No. 1, 2021, pp. 69~88.10.1080/0015198X.2020.1816366
  20. Pástor, Ľ., R. F. Stambaugh, and L. A. Taylor, “Sustainable Investing in Equilibrium,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 142, No. 2, 2021, pp. 550~571.10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011
  21. Serafeim, G., and A. Yoon, Stock Price Reactions to ESG News: The Role of ESG Ratings and Disagreement, Review of Accounting Studies, 2022a.10.1007/s11142-022-09675-3
  22. Serafeim, G., and A. Yoon, Stock Price Reactions to ESG News: The Role of ESG Ratings and Disagreement, Review of Accounting Studies, 2022b, pp. 1~31.10.2139/ssrn.3765217
  23. Serafeim, G., and A. Yoon, “Which Corporate ESG News does the Market React to?” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2022c, pp. 59~78.10.1080/0015198X.2021.1973879
  24. Tian, G. Y., and G. Twite, “Corporate Governance, External Market Discipline and Firm Productivity,” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2011, pp. 403~417.10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2010.12.004
  25. Turban, D. B., and D. W. Greening, “Corporate Social Performance and Organizational Attractiveness to Prospective Employees,” The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1997, pp. 658~672.10.2307/257057
  26. Whited, T. M., and G. Wu, “Financial Constraints Risk,” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2006, pp. 531~559.10.1093/rfs/hhj012
  27. Xue, Q., Y. Jin, and C. Zhang, ESG Rating Results and Corporate Total Factor Productivity, International Review of Financial Analysis, 2024, 103381.10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103381
  28. Yu, X., and Y. Chen, “Does ESG Advantage Promote Total Factor Productivity (TFP)? Empirical Evidence from China’s Listed Enterprises,” Applied Economics, 2024, pp. 1~17.10.1080/00036846.2024.2336886
  29. Zhang, X., X. Zhao, and L. Qu, “Do Green Policies Catalyze Green Investment? Evidence from ESG Investing Developments in China,” Economics Letters, Vol. 207, 2021, 110028.10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110028
Information
  • Publisher :Environmental and Resource Economics Review
  • Publisher(Ko) :자원 · 환경경제연구
  • Journal Title :자원·환경경제연구
  • Journal Title(Ko) :Environmental and Resource Economics Review
  • Volume : 34
  • No :1
  • Pages :1-26