All Issue

2019 Vol.28, Issue 2

Research Paper

30 June 2019. pp. 177~200
Abstract
Energy demand forecast which serves as an essential input in energy policy is exposed to multiple factors of uncertainty such as GDP and weather forecast uncertainty. The Master Plan of Electricity Market in Korea which is biennially prepared is critically based on fluctuating energy demand forecast whereas its resulting proposal on electricity generation mix is substantially irreversible. The paper provides a real options model to evaluate energy transition policy by considering Knightian uncertainty as a measure to study multiple uncertainties with multiple set of probability distributions. Our finding is that the current energy transition policy under the master plan is not robust in terms of securing stable management of electricity demand and supply system.
전력수급계획의 근간이 되는 전력수요 전망은 GDP와 기상변수 등 다양한 요인에 의해 영향을 받기 때문에 확률 프로세스로 이해할 수 있다. 이 전망치를 바탕으로 전력설비의 구성방안이 수립되는데, 실제 의사결정 과정은 주어진 확률분포에 대한 정보가 온전하다고 가정한다는 한계를 가진다. 그러나 현실적으로는 확률분포 자체의 중첩 불확실성이 존재하기 때문에 강건한 최적계획(robust optimization)의 수립이 필요하다. 본 논문은 중첩 불확실성을 포함한 발전설비 조정의 최적의사결정을 연구한다. 구체적으로 원자력의 감축투자 관련 실물옵션 모형을 수립하고 우리나라 전력수급기본계획의 특성을 고려한 중첩 불확실성하에서 원전감축 투자를 분석한다. 분석 결과, 현재의 원전축소 정책은 전력수요 증가율이 낮다는 것을 전제로 한 정책으로서 전력수요 증가에 대응할 수 있는 정책 강건성을 갖추지는 못한다는 것을 보여준다.
References
  1. Alonzo, D., Knightian uncertainty in banking crisis, LUISS, 2014.
  2. Caballero, R. J. and A. Krishnamurthy, “Collective risk management in a flight to quality episode,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 63, No. 5, 2008, pp. 2195~2230. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01394.x
  3. Chang, F-R., Stochastic Optimization in Continuous Time, Cambridge, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511616747
  4. Chen, Y-F., M. Funke, and N. Glanemann, Dark clouds or silver linings? Knightian uncertainty and climate change, CESifo working paper No.3516, 2011.
  5. Cox, J. C., and C-F. Huang, “Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1989, pp. 33~83.10.1016/0022-0531(89)90067-7
  6. Epstein, L. G., and T. Wang, “Intertemporal asset pricing under Knightian uncertainty,” Econometrica, 1994, pp. 283~322.10.2307/2951614
  7. Hansen, L. P., and T. Sargent, Robustness, Princeton University Press, 2016.
  8. Ilut, C., and M. Schneider, Ambiguous business cycles, NBER, 2012.22301896
  9. Karatzas, I., S. E. Shreve, Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus, Springer, 1991.
  10. Knight, F.H., Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Houghton Mifflin, 1921.
  11. Lund, D., “How to analyze the investment-uncertainty relationship in real option models?,” Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 14, 2005, pp. 311~322.10.1016/j.rfe.2004.10.001
  12. Nishimura, K. G., and H. Ozaki, “Irreversible investment and Knightian uncertainty,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 136. No. 1, 2007, pp. 668~894.10.1016/j.jet.2006.10.011
  13. Nishimura, K. G., and H. Ozaki, Economics of Pessimism and Optimism, Springer, 2017.10.1007/978-4-431-55903-0
  14. Park, H., “Real option analysis for effects of emission permit banking on investment under abatement cost uncertainty,” Economic Modelling, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1314~1321.10.1016/j.econmod.2012.04.012
  15. Pritsker, M., “Knightian uncertainty and interbank lending,” Journal of Financial Intermediation, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2013, pp. 85~105.10.1016/j.jfi.2012.09.001
  16. Schrӧder, D., “Investment under ambiguity with the best and worst in mind,” Mathematical Financial Economics, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2013, pp. 107~133.10.1007/s11579-011-0036-3
  17. Valenti, D., B. Spagnolo, and G. Bonanno, “Hitting time distributions in financial markets,” Physica A, Vol. 382, No. 1, 2007, pp. 311~320.10.1016/j.physa.2007.03.044
  18. Wilmott, P., Paul Wilmott on Quantitative Finance, Willey, 2000.
Information
  • Publisher :Environmental and Resource Economics Review
  • Publisher(Ko) :자원 · 환경경제연구
  • Journal Title :자원·환경경제연구
  • Journal Title(Ko) :Environmental and Resource Economics Review
  • Volume : 28
  • No :2
  • Pages :177~200